Automatic licence plate scanners: the good, the bad, the challenging

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) have emerged as a crucial component in the toolkit of US law enforcement agencies. These systems are more than surveillance tools; they are pivotal to enhancing the effectiveness of police operations - especially since over 70% of crimes in the US involve a motor vehicle​​.

Yet, ALPRs also prompt crucial debates on public opinion, data management challenges, and crime-fighting effectiveness - how are law enforcement agencies supposed to find the balance? 


The double-edged sword of ALPR efficiency

Traditional methods of license plate checks are time-consuming and labour-intensive - officers manually check up to 150 plates per hour. 

In stark contrast, ALPR technology allows the scanning of 3,600 vehicles in the same time frame. This not only multiplies efficiency but also enables US officers to dedicate more time to critical policing tasks​​.

A study in Piedmont, California, revealed that less than 0.3% of licence plate reader hits led to an investigative lead. Additionally, a 2021 Texas A&M Transportation Institute study suggests factors like weather or outdated databases can result in false-positive hits.

While these systems drastically increase the volume of scanned vehicles and enhance police productivity, this low rate of meaningful investigative leads and the risk of false positives can cause problems. 


Addressing law enforcement challenges with ALPRs

One of the primary concerns for law enforcement agencies, especially smaller ones, is limited budgets since acquiring these systems often strains the financial resources of many departments.

Smaller agencies also face technical hurdles, particularly in managing the large-scale data collected by ALPR systems. Limited IT support and inadequate server space are common issues, making it difficult to keep up with the demands of modern technology. 

Another critical concern is privacy and data security. 

ALPR usage is governed by a patchwork of state laws, which adds complexity to data management. Agencies must navigate these legal frameworks while balancing operational needs with privacy concerns - such as secure storage, data breaches, and compliance with varying state laws on data retention. 


Public opinion on ALPRs

Public opinion around license plate technology varies, with many concerns over privacy and civil liberties. 

In Berkeley, the City Council's decision to adopt ALPRs has been controversial, with residents and advocacy organisations worried about potential civil liberties violations. The ACLU of Northern California highlights concerns about ALPR deployment in overpoliced areas, whereas some council members and public commenters support ALPRs for crime prevention. 

There is also increased use of ALPRs by the public. In the hands of neighbourhood groups and homeowner’s associations who both lack law enforcement training and public accountability, the potential for misuse and over-surveillance of this technology becomes a real concern. In response, there is growing demand for clear regulations and oversight to prevent the misuse of ALPR data. A balance between public safety and privacy rights is crucial. 


A possible balanced solution: video redaction

A multifaceted approach is necessary to balance law enforcement needs with public privacy rights.

There are crucial steps that need to be taken to find this necessary balance - for example, clear regulations that ensure robust data storage and access control practices, and targeted training that incorporates advanced redaction technology for better privacy. There’s also a need for guidelines around transparency and accountability that actively engage communities.

Solutions with license plate redaction capabilities, such as Secure Redact, can be a game-changer. 

Personal data redaction protects vital information and demonstrates a commitment to addressing law enforcement’s operational challenges and the privacy concerns of the public. 


It's imperative to approach ALPR use with a balanced perspective that ensures security and public safety. With proper regulation, oversight, and technological advancements, it's possible to harness the benefits of ALPRs while safeguarding individual privacy rights.


Need help with license plate redaction?

Previous
Previous

The global AI regulation race: a world transformed by technology

Next
Next

2024’s top video privacy and security trends: a new frontier of digital safety